Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:20:27 -0800 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller |
| |
On 10/30/06, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote: > and go on discussing the next question - interface. > > Right now this is the most diffucult one and there are two > candidates - syscalls and configfs. I've pointed my objections > agains configfs and haven't seen any against system calls... >
Some objections:
- they require touching every architecture to add the new system calls - they're harder to debug from userspace, since you can't using useful tools such as echo and cat - changing the interface is harder since it's (presumably) a binary API
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |