lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
    On 10/30/06, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
    > and go on discussing the next question - interface.
    >
    > Right now this is the most diffucult one and there are two
    > candidates - syscalls and configfs. I've pointed my objections
    > agains configfs and haven't seen any against system calls...
    >

    Some objections:

    - they require touching every architecture to add the new system calls
    - they're harder to debug from userspace, since you can't using useful
    tools such as echo and cat
    - changing the interface is harder since it's (presumably) a binary API

    Paul
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-30 19:25    [W:0.021 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site