Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:27:14 +0100 | From | Jarek Poplawski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() |
| |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:12:41PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > Here are some doubts... ... > On 30-10-2006 10:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > > Subject: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested); > > > > #endif > > > > > > Shouldn't this _nested locks be considered in: > #else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT: */ > part?
Sorry, this one is not my doubt anymore.
Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |