[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON / WARN_ON_ONCE regression
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 17:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Perhaps the `static int __warn_once' is getting put in the same cacheline
> as some frequently-modified thing. Perhaps try marking that as __read_mostly?

I've tried marking static int __warn_once as __read_mostly. However, it
did not help with reducing the cache miss :(

So I would suggest reversing the "Let WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE return the
condition" patch. It has just been added 3 days ago so reversing it
should not be a problem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-04 03:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean