![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 08:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:44:42PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 09:21 +0000, Alessandro Suardi wrote: > > > we've been just through an email thread where it has been > > > determined that wpa_supplicant 0.4.9 (I would assume that > > > 0.5.5 is also okay) and wireless-tools from Jean's latest > > > tarball are necessary to work with the recent wireless > > > extensions v21 that have been merged in. > > > > > > What wireless-tools are you using ? > > > > This must be considered a kernel bug - it's not allowed to break > > userspace compatibility in a stable series.> > But there is no development series. The closest thing we have is the > merge window after each release -- which is exactly when this issue > revealed itself.> > Wireless in general (and the wireless extensions api in particular) > is a bit of a 'whipping boy' in the Linux world. OK, we suck. > Everyone wants to display their wisdom by telling us how much we suck! > We know all about it...> > We have sucked, and we continue to suck -- and we are working on it. > But, we are not going to be able to whip-up this omelette without > breaking a few eggs. If we can't do that during the merge windows, > WHEN CAN WE DO IT? This is a question for Linus, it's his rule... Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-03 17:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||