lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: why test for "__GNUC__"?
    On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

    > On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:44:18AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
    > > p.s. is there, in fact, any part of the kernel source tree that has a
    > > preprocessor directive to identify the use of ICC? just curious.
    >
    > Please, do
    >
    > ls include/linux/compiler-*

    but according to compiler.h:

    /* Intel compiler defines __GNUC__. So we will overwrite implementations
    * coming from above header files here
    */

    so even ICC will define __GNUC__, which means that testing for
    __GNUC__ is *still*, under the circumstances, redundant, isn't that
    right?

    rday
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-10-29 16:53    [W:0.021 / U:0.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site