![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 27 October 2006 23:46, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:35:24 -0700 > > thockin@hockin.org wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:06:12PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > So far, has I can understand. Seems to me that my computer which have > > > > a Pentium D (Dual Core) on VIA chipset, also have unsynchronized TSC > > > > and with the patch of hrtimers on > > > > > > Intel systems (except for some large highend systems) have synchronized > > > TSCs. > > > > Does Intel guarantee that, or is that just what we happen to see, so far. > > Matthias has a Xeon machine on which the TSCs are unsynced, and which are > unsyncable - write_tsc() just doesn't do anything. See thread at > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/22/104 That is a clear BIOS bug (FSBs are programmed incorrectly) and doesn't seem to be common. In fact the BIOS bug is so bad that it's surprising the system works at all. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-28 11:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||