lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 27 Oct 2006 22:32:28 -0700
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [patch] drivers: wait for threaded probes between initcall levels
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:19:25 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> The simplest implementation of "A needs B to have run" is for A to simply
> call B, and B arranges to not allow itself to be run more than once.
> 
> But that doesn't work in the case "A needs B to be run, but only if B is
> present".  Resolving this one would require something like a fancy
> "synchronisation object" against which dependers and dependees can register
> interest, and a core engine which takes care of the case where a depender
> registers against something which no dependees have registered.

otoh, we could stick with the simple "A calls B" solution, and A also
provides an attribute-weak implementation of B to cover the "A needs B but
only if B is present" problems.

Had to say, really - one would need to study some specific problem cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-28 05:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2008