![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi. On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 18:57 +1000, David Chinner wrote: > I didn't think we've ever done that - periodic or delayed operations > are passed off to the kernel threads to execute. A stack trace > (if you still have it) would be really help here. I don't, but I know how to get it again. Will give it a go shortly. > Hmmm - we have a couple of per-cpu work queues as well that are > used on I/O completion and that can, in some circumstances, > trigger new transactions. If we are only flush metadata, then > I don't think that any more I/o will be issued, but I could be > wrong (maze of twisty passages). I can understand that. I'm trying to learn Xgl programming at the mo :) Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-26 11:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||