lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 24 Oct 2006 23:01:24 -0700
Fromyhlu <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
I cut the code paste the lines from __assign_irq_vector().

It seems we need to change
    if (old_vector >= 0) {
in __assign_irq_vector with this one to
    if (old_vector > 0) {
later.   Eric?
YH




> The two conditionals don't complement each other; in fact, only one
> conditional is required since the test for old_vector equality to zero
> will never be satisfied.  Also note that irq_vectors are u8 on x86_64 and
> not ints.
>
>         static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
>         {
>                 u8 old_vector = irq_vector[irq];
>                 if (old_vector > 0) {
>                         cpumask_t old_mask;
>                         int old_cpu;
>                         cpus_and(old_mask, irq_domain[irq], cpu_online_map);
>                         for_each_cpu_mask(old_cpu, old_mask)
>                                 per_cpu(vector_irq, old_cpu)[old_vector] = -1;
>                 }
>                 irq_vector[irq] = 0;
>                 irq_domain[irq] = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>         }
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-25 06:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008