![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:57:36 +0200 "Linux Portal" <linportal@gmail.com> wrote: > ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks > to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either > slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise, > winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during > testing. > > http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html ext4 doesn't implement delayed allocation (yet). I made some observations regarding comparative benchmarking of filesystems when releasing 2.6.19-rc1-mm1. They seem to have been ignored ;) See ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/announce.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-22 06:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||