![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> > > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700 > > > > > Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any > > > differently than out-of-tree other code. > > > > I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to > > requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable. > > Don't you think? > > > Netdump doesn't even exist in the current Fedora source rpm. > I think Dave dropped it. Indeed. Practically no-one cared about it, so it bit-rotted really fast after we shipped RHEL4. That, along with the focus shifting to making kdump work seemed to kill it off over the last 12 months. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-21 07:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||