Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:31:59 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions |
| |
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:19:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:07:22 +0100 > Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > Subject : undefined reference to highest_possible_node_id > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/4/233 > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/15/11 > > > > Submitter : Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> > > > > Caused-By : Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com> > > > > commit 0f532f3861d2c4e5aa7dcd33fb18e9975eb28457 > > > > Status : unknown > > > > > > Looking at this commit and the mails, it was known on the 4th September > > > that this patch caused build errors while this change was in -mm, yet it > > > still found its way into mainline on 2nd October. > > > > > > Is anyone going to look at fixing this problem, or should we be asking > > > for the commit to be reverted? > > > > Since everyone seems intent at ignoring this issue, here's a patch to > > try to solve it. > > I sent the below to Linus yesterday...
Ah, okay. Must not have poped out of the other side of Linus by 6am GMT then. (We also seem to have non-working git snapshots again, so when I looked at the ARM kautobuild it showed the same old errors.)
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |