Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: Correct way to format spufs file output. | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:38:50 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 20 October 2006 15:54, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote: > I think %0xllx is the way to go. I would even advocate changing > signal1_type and signal2_type unless it is actually too dangerous.
There is absolutely no reason why these should be hexadecimal, they are basically implementing a bool.
> Is there even a case where changing from %llu to %0xllx would break things? > Perhaps with the combination of a old library with a new kernel?
Right, a library or some script that has been written assuming there is no leading 0x.
Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |