lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: pci_fixup_video change blows up on sparc64
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
>On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:32:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: <eiichiro.oiwa.nm@hitachi.com>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:49:26 +0900
>>
>> > The "0xc0000" is a physical address. The BAR (PCI base address) is also
>> > a physcail address. There are no difference.
>>
>> Your assertion that the BAR is a physical address is very platform
>> specific. It may be a "physical address in PCI bus space", but
>> that has no relation to the first argument passed to ioremap()
>> which is defined in a completely different way.
>>
>> On many platforms, the BAR of PCI devices are translated into an
>> appropriate "ioremap() cookie" in the struct pci_dev resource[] array
>> entries, so that they can be used properly as the first argument to
>> ioremap(). Only address cookies properly setup by the platform may be
>> legally passed into ioremap() as the first argument. No such setups
>> are being made on this raw 0xc0000 address.
>>
>> So, as you can see, I/O port and I/O memory space work differently on
>> different platforms and this abstraction of the first argument to
>> ioremap() is how we provide support for such differences.
>>
>> If you try to access 0xc0000 via ioremap() on sparc64, it is going to
>> try and access that area non-cacheable which, since 0xc0000 is
>> physical RAM, will result in a BUS ERROR and a crash.
>>
>> This physical location might be the area for the video ROM on x86,
>> x86_64, and perhaps even IA64, but it certainly is not used this way
>> on sparc64 systems.
>>
>> I really would like to see this regression fixed, or at the very
>> least this code protected by X86, X86_64, IA64 conditionals.
>
>I agree. Eiichiro, care to send me an patch to fix this somehow? Or do
>you want me to just revert it?
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
>

Ok, I sent an patch to fix on only x86, x86_64 and IA64 for 2.6.18.
Do you need an patch aganist 2.6.19-git?

thanks,
Eiichiro

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-20 05:25    [W:0.081 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site