![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.
Agreed - that's why I am about to send a patch that removes
the sched domain side affects of the cpu_exclusive flag.
Well, not entirely agreed. User space code does need
to be able to specify some cpus as isolated from scheduler
balancing. I will send a second patch to support that.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-19 10:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||