![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Dinakar wrote:
> I dont think this is a valid optimization.
I probably don't agree, but I think there might be a better way to deal
with this line of code - remove the entire routine ;).
I have a patch set I am about to send in to lkml for comment, that
removes the entire mechanism connecting cpusets to sched domains,
replacing it with a much simpler (even I can understand) mechanism to
update the isolated_cpu_map on the fly.
If that flies, then this present patch becomes obsolete and irrelevant.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-19 07:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||