[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: fsstack: struct path
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:35:51AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:31:03 -0700
> Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> > > One, rather unfortunate, fact is that struct path is also defined in
> > > include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h as something completely different - reiserfs
> > > specific.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > reiserfs is being bad. s/path/reiserfs_path/g
> There's also drivers/md/dm-mpath.h's struct path. Renaming fs/namei.c's
> `struct path' to `struct namei_path' would be prudent.

Yuck... If we really want to switch to it (and I can give you a dozen
examples of possible users right now - starting with struct file), putting
namei_ into it is both uninformative and ugly.

I'm not sure what would be the good name here; "pathname" comes to mind,
but it suggests that we are dealing with a string. And "location" is
too vague (and probably would cause fsckloads of conflicts itself).

Suggestions? "pathname" would almost work; the difference is that this
is not a string but a node in tree that string resolves to.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-18 11:09    [W:0.048 / U:1.732 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site