lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:00:25 +1000 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > If the drivers doesn't care and if it makes no difference to performance
> > then just delete the call to pci_set_mwi().
> >
> > But if MWI _does_ make a difference to performance then we should tell
> > someone that it isn't working rather than silently misbehaving?
>
> That sounds like we need a printk inside pci_set_mwi then, rather than
> adding a printk to every single caller.
>

I think so, yes. That's a good solution to a lot of these things.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-16 02:19    [W:0.067 / U:2.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site