![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Em Sáb, 2006-10-14 às 21:14 +0200, Adrian Bunk escreveu: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:57:10PM -0400, Michael Krufky wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Two separate problems, please do not confuse them. > > > > My tda10086 and tda826x patches are correct -- there is no question of it. > > The problem is that they don't fix the whole problem. Yes. Trent made two patches using your suggestion of checking for MODULE. I'll submit it to Linus probably tomorrow after some tests. If you want to review, they are at: http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb?cmd=changeset;node=b8c06286cb3a;style=gitweb http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb?cmd=changeset;node=18a778dbf540;style=gitweb > To be honest and after looking deeper at it, I don't like this > CONFIG_DVB_FE_CUSTOMIZE approach at all since it adds that much > complexity for not much gain. Yes, it adds some complexity. The gain, however, is to allow having smaller kernel size on embedded systems and DVR using MythTV or Freevo. There's a similar feature for V4L (Autoselect pertinent encoders/decoders and other helper chips), that allows selecting just the needed stuff. > > I'd simply select all frontends unconditionally Most users do this, including me :) Cheers, Mauro. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-10-15 03:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||