lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Can context switches be faster?
John Richard Moser wrote:
> That's a load more descriptive :D
>
> 0.890 uS, 0.556uS/cycle, that's barely 2 cycles you know. (Pentium M)
> PPC performs similarly, 1 cycle should be about 1uS.
>

No, you're a factor of 1000 off - these numbers show the context switch
is around 1600-75000 cycles. And that doesn't really tell the whole
story: if caches/TLB get flushed on context switch, then the newly
switched-to task will bear the cost of having cold caches, which isn't
visible in the raw context switch time.

But modern x86 processors have a very quick context switch time, and I
don't think there's much room for improvement aside from
micro-optimisations (though that might change if the architecture grows
a way to avoid flushing the TLB on switch).

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-12 22:35    [W:0.076 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site