Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.18 suspend regression on Intel Macs | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:41:28 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 12:39 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Well, I'm not sure it qualifies as a regression, because AFAIK no > > official kernels can s2ram/resume Intel Macs correctly out of the box. > ... > > > There has already been some discussion about the SCI_EN ACPI control bit > > not being set when the Mactel boxes come out of suspend to ram. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=114957637501557&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115005083610700&w=2 > > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6670 > > > > The symptom is: > > irq 9: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > > Disabling IRQ #9 > > when the system comes out of sleep, making ACPI non-functional. > > > > Two days after having released 2.6.17, Linus commited a fix for this > > issue in his tree (commit 5603509137940f4cbc577281cee62110d4097b1b): > > If fix was in 2.6.18-gitX, yes, that probably counts as a regression
"fix" for some value of the word. The problem is that this is very much against the spec, and also quite likely breaks a bunch of machines...
If we do this we probably should at least key this of some DMI identification for the mac mini..
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |