lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 10 Oct 2006 08:11:24 +0200
FromThomas_Hellström <>
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

>
>>>Could it be an option to make it safe for the fault handler to 
>>>temporarily drop the mmap_sem read lock given that some conditions TBD 
>>>are met?
>>>In that case it can retake the mmap_sem write lock, do the VMA flags 
>>>modifications, downgrade and do the pte modifications using a helper, or 
>>>even use remap_pfn_range() during the time the write lock is held?
>>> 
>>>
>>When you drop and retake the mmap_sem, you need to start again from
>>find_vma. At which point you technically probably want to start again
>>from the architecture specfic fault code. It sounds difficult but I
>>won't say it can't be done.
>> 
>>
>
>I can be done with returning NOPAGE_REFAULT but as you said, I don't
>think it's necessary.
> 
>
Still, even with NOPAGE_REFAULT or the equivalent with the new fault() code,
in the case we need to take this route, (and it looks like we won't have 
to),
I guess we still need to restart from find_vma() in the fault()/nopage() 
handler to make sure the VMA is still present. The object mutex need to 
be dropped as well to avoid deadlocks. Sounds complicated.

>Cheers,
>Ben.
>
>
> 
>
/Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-10-10 06:15    [W:0.300 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans