Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 1 Oct 2006 00:53:05 -0700 | From | Pete Zaitcev <> | Subject | Re: appletouch vs. usbhid |
| |
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:17:39 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com> wrote: > On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:20, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed > > exclusions for Apple pointers: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721 > > Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these? > > Yes, I think we should. > > > Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH? > > No, I think we should just do that unconditionally and have users select > appletouch driver.
The reporter sent /proc/bus/usb/devices, and the situation seems clearer now. Perhaps this explains why authors of appletouch didn't add exclusions themselves.
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 4 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=05ac ProdID=0218 Rev= 0.64 S: Manufacturer=Apple Computer S: Product=Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad C:* #Ifs= 3 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr= 40mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=usbhid E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 8 Ivl=8ms I: If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=appletouch E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 64 Ivl=8ms I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=usbhid E: Ad=84(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=8ms
Since it's a multi-interface device, it can't be blacklisted by the existing quirk bits, can it?
-- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |