Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Announce: gcc bogus warning repository | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:03:10 -0700 |
| |
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:00 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 11:58:33AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 14:45 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > That doesn't address my question at all. > > > > Did you have a question? > > > > > If there is no difference between real non-init bugs and bogus warnings, > > > then a config option doesn't make any difference at all, does it? Real > > > bugs are still hidden either way: if the warnings are turned on, the > > > bugs are lost in the noise. if the warnings are turned off, the bugs > > > are completely hidden. > > > > If you turn the warnings on, at least you have a chance to see a warning > > even if it's mixed with others. > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |