[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] rcu: join rcu_ctrlblk and rcu_state
    On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:43:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > >
    > > This patch looks sane to me. It passes a short one-hour rcutorture
    > > on ppc64 and x86, firing up some overnight runs as well.
    > >
    > > Dipankar, Manfred, any other concerns? Cacheline alignment? (Seems
    > > to me this code is far enough from the fastpath that this should not
    > > be a problem, but thought I should ask.)
    > I'd ask you and Oleg to re-synchronize, and perhaps Oleg to re-send the
    > (part of?) the series that has no debate. I'm unsure, for example, whether
    > #2 was just to be dropped.

    I believe that the original #2 is to be dropped, but that the patch Oleg
    submitted in:

    may be needed. I have added Vatsa to the CC to get his take on this.

    However, this patch should be independent from #4, so it should be OK
    to apply an updated #4 first while we are working out what to do about #2.

    > I already applied #1, and it looks like there's agreement on #3 and #4,
    > but basically, just to make sure, can Oleg please re-send to make sure I
    > got it right?
    > Getting a screwed-up RCU thing is going to be too painful to debug, so I'd
    > rather get it right the first time it hits my tree..

    Been there more times than I care to admit, and I most definitely agree!!!

    Thanx, Paul
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-10 03:56    [W:0.021 / U:3.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site