lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 8 Jan 2006 20:29:43 +0100 (MET)
FromJan Engelhardt <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
>> >> Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option?
>> >
>> >I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED
>> >portion.
>> >
>> At its present state, no distribution uses configfs afaik, so I'd love to 
>> have that turned off to not enlarge the kernel binary unnecessary.
>
>Well, ocfs2 needs it, and as that just hit mainline, it's a bit unfair
>to state that no distro uses it (and I think that it's even untrue, look
>for the distros that ship ocfs2...)

Well ok. What I mean is: I don't want to have configfs if I do not also 
want ocfs2.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-08 19:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008