![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>> >> Why is CONFIGFS_FS a user-visible option? >> > >> >I think it should be the same as SYSFS, only changable from the EMBEDDED >> >portion. >> > >> At its present state, no distribution uses configfs afaik, so I'd love to >> have that turned off to not enlarge the kernel binary unnecessary. > >Well, ocfs2 needs it, and as that just hit mainline, it's a bit unfair >to state that no distro uses it (and I think that it's even untrue, look >for the distros that ship ocfs2...) Well ok. What I mean is: I don't want to have configfs if I do not also want ocfs2. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-08 19:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||