![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:34:35 +0100 > I agree, I do use a hashed spinlock array on my local tree for TCP, > mainly to reduce the hash table size by a 2 factor. So what do you think about going to a single spinlock for the routing cache? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-07 07:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||