Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response | Date | Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:38:50 +1100 |
| |
On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:31, Peter Williams wrote: > In any case and in the meantime, perhaps the solution is to use > TASK_NONINTERACTIVE where needed but treat > TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_NONINTERACTIVE sleep the same as > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleep instead of ignoring it?
That's how I would tackle it.
Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |