lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 07 Jan 2006 08:34:35 +0100
FromEric Dumazet <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
Andi Kleen a écrit :
> 
> I always disliked the per chain spinlocks even for other hash tables like
> TCP/UDP multiplex - it would be much nicer to use a much smaller separately 
> hashed lock table and save cache. In this case the special case of using
> a one entry only lock hash table makes sense.
> 

I agree, I do use a hashed spinlock array on my local tree for TCP, mainly to 
reduce the hash table size by a 2 factor.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-07 07:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2008