lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: request for opinion on synaptics, adb and powerpc
Date
On Saturday 07 January 2006 03:25, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>
> If a relative mode is an absolute must, then a kernel option is IMO
> sufficient (we have psmouse.proto=imps for the classic PS/2 Synaptics
> pads), although a sysfs attribute would likely be better.
>

Just FYI, writing into /sys/bus/serio/devices/serioX/protcol allows
swicthing ptorocol dynamically (this involves teardown of old input
device and creation of a new one).

> In theory, we could use EV_SYN, SYN_CONFIG for notifying applications
> that the device has changed its capabilities, but a
> disconnect/recreation will work better, since no applications support
> the SYN_CONFIG notification ATM.
>

I could see SYN_CONFIG being used to signal changes in limits (like min
and max X coordinates) but not to basic device capabilities.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-07 17:07    [W:0.626 / U:1.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site