Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 5/7] uninline capable() | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:22:19 +0100 |
| |
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:18 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 06 January 2006 11:42, you wrote: > > Index: linux-2.6.15/include/linux/sched.h > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.15.orig/include/linux/sched.h > > +++ linux-2.6.15/include/linux/sched.h > > @@ -1102,19 +1102,8 @@ static inline int sas_ss_flags(unsigned > > } > > > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY > > -/* code is in security.c */ > > +/* code is in security.c or kernel/sys.c if !SECURITY */ > > extern int capable(int cap); > > BTW, is there a special reason why this is declared in sched.h > instead of capability.h?
probably a lot of historic bagage... anyway not something that should be cleaned up as part of this series, could maybe be done in another patch if you feel so inclined :)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |