Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:52:03 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for single threadedprocess at getrusage() |
| |
Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > > + need_lock = !(p == current && thread_group_empty(p)); > > Isnt > > need_lock = (p != current || !thread_group_empty(b)) > > clearer?
I was actually going to change it to
if (p != current || !thread_group_empty(p)) need_lock = 1;
a) because my brain works that way and
b) To make the currently-unneeded initialisation of need_lock do something useful ;)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |