Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 20:04:13 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: Adds missing __init. |
| |
>diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c >index 06cad2d..5eeae0d 100644 >--- a/net/core/pktgen.c >+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c >@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static int pktgen_add_device(struct pktg > return add_dev_to_thread(t, pkt_dev); > } > >-static struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char* name) >+static struct pktgen_thread __init *pktgen_find_thread(const char* name)
I do not know what CodingStyle says about it (it is correct GCC code), what do the others think of the more often placement of __init as in __init static struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char *name) or static __init struct pktgen_thread *pktgen_find_thread(const char *name) [depending on what people like]
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |