lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: __getname vs kmalloc
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:19:29AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 01:32 -0500, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > Which is the prefered method of allocating memory __getname or kmalloc?
>
> Depends entirely on the purpose. __getname uses the "names_cache" slab
> and allocates PATH_MAX sized chunks. It is mainly supposed to be used
> for temporary storage of an entire path.
>
> Most callers use getname(), which also does the string length sanity
> checks and then copies the path from userland memory.

Ah, so since I am working with path components that'll get most of the
time passed to lookup_one_len & friends, kmalloc is the better way to
get memory, correct?

Thanks,
Jeff Sipek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-04 11:37    [W:0.712 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site