![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In article <9c21eeae0601032316l3259fbecle6a0b290ed244e12@mail.gmail.com> (at Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:16:02 -0800), David Brown <dmlb2000@gmail.com> says: > patch-2.6.15-rt1-1 has the ipv6 patch yet is smaller than the initial > patch. I created the patch using: > $ diff -uprN linux-2.6.15 linux-2.6.15-rt1 > patch-2.6.15-rt1-1 > > Is this not the way you did it? I noticed different headers in my > patch vs. the patch posted. Really I'm concerned about missing > anything in the patch, considering it's 700+ lines smaller. I have linux-2.6 git tree and I did something like this: $ cd linux-2.6 $ patch -p1 < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1 hack, hack, hack... $ patch -p1 -R < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1 $ git reset $ git diff --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-04 08:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||