Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:42:59 +0100 | From | Harald Welte <> | Subject | Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers |
| |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:45:40AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:16:07PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > That sentence is not clear to me. Are you're saying that it was > > possible to download the object code without source code, or that > > _only_ the object code was available? > > Why don't you go and look instead of quibbling in the abstract? > The binary is *currently* available, and no source code is.
Ok, the binary is still available, which was new to me. I was unable to find it on their homepage.
> > And, again, I'm not a lawyer. FSF legals will presumably have a more > > authoritative answer. > > Yes. You're not a lawyer. Stop wasting everybody's time by trying to > interpret a legal document.
Mathew, Jamie, guys: Please calm down. No reason to get down to that level.
-- - Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> http://gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |