![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"Eric W. Biederman" wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes: > > > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> > >> Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > > >> > - list_add_tail(&thread->tasks, &init_task.tasks); > >> > >> The last deletion is wrong, I beleive. > > > > Just to clarify, it looks like we can kill this line because > > de_thread() also does list_add_tail(current, &init_task.tasks). > > > > But please note that it (and probably __ptrace_link() above) > > does list_del(current->task) first, and current->task may have > > very stale values after old leader called dup_task_struct(). > > SET_LINKS() in copy_process() does nothing with ->tasks in a > > CLONE_THREAD case. > > Good point in that instance we need to remove the list_del > as well. We can't just remove this list_del, note __ptrace_link() above. So if we remove list_add from switch_exec_pids() (like you did in your patch) we should also place list_add before ptrace_link() in de_thread(), otherwise I beleive it is a bug. I agree, we should cleanup this. I just noticed that I forgot to add you on CC: list while sending this patch: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113862839924746 Btw, I don't understand why __ptrace_link() use REMOVE_LINKS/SET_LINKS instead of remove_parent/add_parent. Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-31 08:53 [W:1.017 / U:0.060 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||