[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
    On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?
    > Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

    You're right this does look suspicious. Let me take a closer look...
    Visit Openswan at
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
    Home Page:
    PGP Key:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-31 23:10    [W:0.019 / U:2.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site