[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?
> Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

You're right this does look suspicious. Let me take a closer look...
Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-31 23:10    [W:0.085 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site