lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
From
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?
> Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

You're right this does look suspicious. Let me take a closer look...
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-31 23:10    [W:0.114 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site