lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
    From
    On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?
    > Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

    You're right this does look suspicious. Let me take a closer look...
    --
    Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
    PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-31 23:10    [W:0.021 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site