![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: >To fix the current problem, you can substitute usleep(0); It will >give the CPU to somebody if it's computable, then give it back to >you. It seems to work in every case that sched_yield() has >mucked up (perhaps 20 to 30 here). > > Isn't that dangerous? Someday, someone working on linux (or some other unixish os) might come up with an usleep implementation where usleep(0) just returns and becomes a no-op. Which probably is ok with the usleep spec - it did sleep for zero time . . . Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-30 08:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||