![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> On Saturday 28 January 2006 19:25, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Testing and merge point in Tejun's flood of patches :) The patch
>> below is against current linux-2.6.git.
>
> These "function(unsigned int *classes)" style functions in
> "libata-core.c" worry me somewhat. Esp. that sometimes you have one class,
> sometimes two.
> This looks like a bug waiting to happen for me.
>
> Could we somehow get a
>
> struct ata_classes {
> unsigned int master;
> unsigned int slave;
> }
>
> here (or similiar), before this is in used everywhere?
>
> Usage would be function(struct ata_classes *classes) then.
>
Hello,
I object. Using array is intentional. Slave aware controllers (PATA /
ata_piix) will use [0..1], most SATA controllers will use only [0], and
PM aware ones will use [0..15]. The intention was requiring low level
drivers of only what they know and normalize them in the core layer.
eg. Current std SATA reset routines consider the argument as *class (a
single class value) and it's intentional. As long as a lldd is aware of
only one device per port, it's allowed/recommeded to consider the passed
classes argument as a pointer to single class value. The rest is upto
the core libata layer.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-30 07:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||