![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> @@ -317,7 +326,9 @@ static long do_fcntl(int fd, unsigned in >> * current syscall conventions, the only way >> * to fix this will be in libc. >> */ >> - err = filp->f_owner.pid; >> + err = 0; >> + if (filp->f_owner.tref->task) >> + err = filp->f_owner.pid; > > Probably not very important, but why don't you use > filp->f_owner.tref->task->pid? This way you could completely get rid of the pid > field in fown_struct. Two reasons. One because task->pid is not the proper value for a thread group. And because task might be NULL. Basically using filp->f_owner.tref->task->pid as my source is a much more complicated expression. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-29 10:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||