lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 28 Jan 2006 23:58:49 -0800 (PST)
FromChuck Wolber <>
SubjectRe: [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Justin M. Forbes wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:30:25PM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > 
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't we supposed to stop doing 
> > this for the 2.6.14 release now that 2.6.15 is out?
> 
> I don't see a problems with doing additional stable releases for any 
> kernel, I just wouldn't commit to supporting any specific number of 
> releases.  Basically if people send enough patches to warrant a 
> review/release there is obviously some interest.  What is the harm?

No harm at all, and that settles it for me then. I like the idea of having 
a demand based release system. If no patches arrive, no releases go out.

..Chuck..


-- 
http://www.quantumlinux.com
 Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
 ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology

 "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
  social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-29 09:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008