![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matthew wrote:
> > I too am inclined to prefer the __GFP_CRITICAL approach over this.> > OK. Chalk one more up for that solution...
I don't think my vote should count for much. See below.
> This is supposed to be an implementation of Andrea's suggestion. There are
> no hooks in ANY page_alloc.c code paths. These patches touch mempool code
> and some slab code, but not any page allocator code.
Yeah - you're right. I misread your patch set. Sorry
for wasting your time.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-28 06:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||