Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:21:14 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress) |
| |
On Fri, Jan 27 2006, Hans Reiser wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the > > > >real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when > >you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture. > > > > > > > He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked > at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed > cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the > real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just > going to keep getting faster.
Yeah and that's ok, I was just interested in seeing some more interesting compression benchmarks so I wondered if you had done that.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |