Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:43:56 -0800 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress) |
| |
Edward Shishkin wrote:
> > I guess this is because real compression is going in background > flush, not in sys_write->write_cryptcompress (which just copies > user's data to page cache). So in this case we have something > very similar to ext2. Reiser4 plain write (write_unix_file) is > more complex, and currently we try to reduce its sys time. > > Edward. > > > > Which means that only real time is a meaningful measurement..... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |