[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dont record local apic ids when they are disabled in MADT
    On Thursday 26 January 2006 14:48, Ashok Raj wrote:
    > Hi Andrew,
    > We had added additional_cpus=xx for x86_64, but apparently there were some
    > BIOSs that had duplicate apic ids when they were reported disabled.
    > It seems fair not to record them, this was causing some bad behaviour due to
    > the duplicate apic id. More details in the bugzilla recorded in the log.

    This means CPU hotplug will require additional non existing code again - or who
    will set up the APIC IDs etc. for the new CPUs then?

    An alternative might be to reject any entries that have the APIC ID of
    an existing entry. That would require that the entries are sorted with disabled
    after enabled
    (in the worst case Linux could sort again)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-26 14:58    [W:0.019 / U:2.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site