![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:04:06AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 18:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [2006-01-24 18:08]: > > > > More interesting question: is pis^H^H^Hsysfs interaction in there safe for > > > > modular code? > > > > > > The core should be safe, at least I was trying to make it this way, so > > > if you see something wrong - shout. Locking is another question > > > though... > > > > So do you want an updated patch using _GPL to export the symbols or to > > change CONFIG_INPUT to boolean? > > I guess having input core as a module does not make much sense, so > we should change CONFIG_INPUT to be boolean _and_ clean up the core > code removing module unloading support. Well, USB or SCSI cores are also modules, so I think there is some point in having that functionality. What were the required symbols? -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-25 07:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||