lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) (was: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?)
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:57 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
    > Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > >> And if you check the amount of completely unneeded code Linux currently has
    > > >> just to implement e.g. SG_IO in /dev/hd*, it could even _save_ space in the
    > > >> kernel when converting to a clean SCSI based design.
    > > >
    > > >Please point me at that huge amount of code. Hint: there is none.
    > >
    > > I'm getting a grin:
    > >
    > > 15:46 takeshi:../drivers/ide > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep SG_IO
    > > (no results)
    > >
    > > Looks like it's already non-redundant :)
    >
    > everything in drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c is duplicate code and I am sure I
    > would find more if I take some time....

    PLEASE don't cc: me on this asinine thread anymore.

    Argh, I KNEW this would end with the same exact flame war.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-01-25 21:19    [W:0.029 / U:29.660 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site