lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 24 Jan 2006 23:15:10 -0800
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] stack overflow safe kdump (2.6.16-rc1-i386) - fault
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@intellilink.co.jp> wrote:
>
> When we have a bloated stack it is likely that it ends up making an
> invalid memory access that in turn causes a page fault. Take this case
> into account in the page fault code.
> 
> +	if (!virt_addr_valid(tsk)) {

Is virt_addr_valid() a sufficiently strong test here?  One could probe the
address to see if it generates a fault, like the __get_user() in
kmem_cache_create().


> +		printk("do_page_fault: Discarding invalid 'current' struct task_struct * = 0x%p\n", tsk);
> +		printk("do_page_fault: Discarding invalid current->mm struct mm_struct * = 0x%p\n", mm);

Try to make the code look nice in an 80-col window please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-25 08:18    [from the cache]
©2003-2008