![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
John Stoffel wrote: >Takashi> As a disk tends to get large, a disk storage has had a >Takashi> capacity to supply multi-TB. But now, ext3 can't support >Takashi> more than 8TB filesystem when blocksize is 4KB. That's why I >Takashi> think ext3 needs to be more than 8TB. > >Man, I don't want to even think about doing an FSCK on an 8TB >filesystem running ext[23] at all. > >In that size range, you really need a filesystem which doesn't need an >FSCK at all. Not sure what the real answer is though... > > An fs that allows consistency checking while in use, perhaps? Then it doesn't matter if it takes days, for you can use the fs in the meantime. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-01-23 09:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||